I read the initial post and it's filled with innuendo. I read implications of deception, criticism of quality, and implication that it's not the real thing ("I knew it was too good to be true"). As long as you deny these aspects of your original post, and the legitimate reactions people have had to them, you will find resistance.

Contrast that post with the following hypothetical post:

"Hey, I noticed that there are a couple of pages missing (the page numbers skip them). I re-downloaded the archive to be sure. Does anyone have these?"

If I were doing SNES programming, I would value any official information, even old revisions that were missing a few pages.